Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 13 - Jul 18
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Suzuki 1281086501 - TensionerOEM Suzuki belt tensioner, part number 1281086501. Designed as a direct replacement for the accessory drive serpentine belt system on compatible Suzuki models. Manufacturer: Suzuki Part Number: 1281086501 Function: Accessory drive serpentine belt tensioner Compatibility: Fits select Suzuki vehicles that use OEM part 1281086501 (check OEM parts catalog for exact model fitment) Suzuki Swift MK2 1. 0 Petrol 1989 2003 Suzuki 1281086501, 12810 86501, 12810
OEM Suzuki belt tensioner, part number 1281086501. Designed as a direct replacement for the accessory drive/serpentine belt system on compatible Suzuki models.
- Manufacturer: Suzuki
- Part Number: 1281086501
- Function: Accessory drive / serpentine belt tensioner
- Compatibility: Fits select Suzuki vehicles that use OEM part 1281086501 (check OEM parts catalog for exact model fitment)
Suzuki Swift MK2 1.0 Petrol 1989-2003
Suzuki 1281086501, 12810-86501, 12810 86501
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 171 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Great Functionality a bit light weight tho!
Color: Black
It’s def functional. It looks nice and is not an eye sore. Def will be easy to maintain for cleaning of dust. HOWEVER, four stars simply cause it is a bit top heavy. I will have to find a solution to weight it down so it’s not so top heavy. Possibly in the future they might design a simple one like this with a simple one pound weight across the bottom. Outside of that tiny little issue…a pretty solid simple compact remote holder that functions. Need I say it is Not an eye sore sitting on th coffee table. That was also a winner n my book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 17, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Minimalist Must-Have.
Color: Black, Color: Black
I recently purchased this faux leather remote control holder, and I couldn’t be more impressed. The design is sleek and minimalist, making it a perfect addition to any modern living room. Its elegant finish gives the impression of genuine leather, yet it comes at an excellent price point that makes it accessible without sacrificing style.
The craftsmanship is solid, with clean stitching and a sturdy structure that keeps remotes neatly organized. It’s not only functional but also adds a touch of sophistication to the space. For anyone looking to declutter their coffee table while maintaining a refined aesthetic, this product is a fantastic choice.
Overall, it combines practicality, elegance, and affordability in a way that’s hard to beat. Highly recommended!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Works great 👍🏻
Color: Black, Color: Black
Exactly as promised, the holder is super convenient, holds the main items I need and looks amazing doing so
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Nice item
Color: Silver Gray
Great size and quality. I ordered gray, nice color. Love that it fits in the drawer of my nightstand!!!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Nice and Elegant.
Size: 7.7" x 7.7" x 1.7", Color: Black (Metal Glided), Size: 7.7" x 7.7" x 1.7", Color: Black (Metal Glided)
Color looks great, material is good quality and fits most of my items. It makes my items look neat and organized. Price is a bit high but worth it in my opinion.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2026